For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Due: after you have completed unit 4 weight: 30% of your final course grade length: 3 essays, 500–700 words each instructions: answer three of the following six questions.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Online Athabasca course on Ethics in Science and Technology! I will give you login info once selected. Assignment 1 is based on reading unit 1-4 which is available online through Athabasca! Answer 3 of the following 6 questions, each one being 500 words (2 pages per question). Citations should ideally be from the readings at the end of each unit, again available through Athabasca! Due: After you have completed Unit 4 Weight: 30% of your final course grade Length: 3 essays, 500–700 words each Instructions: Answer three of the following six questions. These questions are based on the Study Guide questions. 1. Briefly summarize the critiques of science by Feyerebend, Marcuse, and Rifkin that are discussed by Stevenson. Why does Stevenson find these critiques interesting but unsatisfactory? 2. Callahan discusses two kinds of ethical principle: teleological and deontological. Explain these two kinds of ethical principle. Use an example to illustrate the application of these two principles. 3. What role do you think informed consent should play in research ethics involving human subjects? Do you think informed consent is sufficient for covering all cases of research on humans? Why or why not? 4. What is Peter Singer’s “principle of equality”? Why does Singer think the principle applies to members of species other than our own? How would society’s treatment of animals change if we followed his principle of equality? To what extent do you agree or disagree with Singer’s reasoning? 5. Brunk identifies a second moral principle in “Professionalism and Moral Responsibility in the Technological Society,” (p. 151), that he says should be part of the “ethic of Conscientious Professionalism.” Identify the principle, and explain how Brunk argues it should influence the thinking of scientists and technical people. Do you agree with his argument? Why or why not? 6. How does James define “whistle blowing,” and under what conditions does he think it is justified? Do you agree with James? Why or why not?

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now